![]() While these considerations are appropriate in theory, they have to be implemented with attention to the public disclosure in mind. In a recent letter to Congress, Barr laid out four categories of material he would consider redacting. News reports suggest that Mueller’s team wrote the report, and in particular its summary, with full awareness of the importance of public disclosure, and therefore anything more than minimal redactions ought to raise red flags. At the same time, we must not lose sight of the civil liberties and privacy implications of the report’s disclosure. It is our position that any redactions in the publicly released report must be assessed in light of what Barr has conceded is the “extraordinary public interest” in the investigation-regardless of the investigation’s conclusions. On Wednesday, Barr said that he would work with Congress to provide access to redacted information as necessary. According to multiple media reports, the Mueller report has detailed descriptions of evidence related to alleged obstruction of justice, but it does not allegedly conclude whether that obstruction of justice occurred. This is essential to determine whether there is a need to investigate if the standard for impeachment of the president has been met. But Congress must be able to read the full report and underlying documents since it is fundamental to its mission, rooted in the Constitution itself, to carry out oversight of the executive branch in our system of checks and balances. Politico reported that Barr said lawmakers will be getting a redacted version of the report, saying Congress does not have a right to view sensitive grand jury information. We’ve also called for public release of the report with minimal redactions that are based only on legitimate and lawful justifications. The ACLU is committed to transparency and accountability in government, and therefore we have called on Attorney General Barr to transmit the full, unredacted report to Congress for its use in oversight, including determining whether a congressional investigation of possible obstruction of justice by Trump and his associates is warranted. At a House hearing, Barr said Tuesday that he intends to release a redacted version of Mueller’s report “within a week” and that he plans to explain his rationale behind each redaction. Yet there remain grave concerns that he will redact significant facts from the report, denying the public access to information. Attorney General William Barr has conceded that there is extraordinary public interest in the report. Few matters are of greater public interest than the contents of the report produced by Special Counsel Robert Mueller on his recently completed investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election, alleged collusion with the Trump administration, and any interference with the Mueller investigation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |